The concept of iterative evidence studies within the Local Plan is quite a dangerous precedent. This could result in a scenario where the public is perpetually left guessing about the status of our community's development. Clarity in governance is essential, and the prospect of endless revisions offers anything but that. Residents must be able to comprehend the guidelines and progress of the Local Plan, yet constant iteration implies there may never be a definitive version available for scrutiny. This may ultimately engender frustration amongst active participants in the democratic process, who rely on understandable documentation for advocacy and engagement.